Voters Approve Over $3.0 Billion Per Year in New Local Taxes

When state ballot initiatives propose new taxes, it’s big news. This past November, voters rejected Proposition 30, which would have added another 1.75 percent tax on personal income above $2.0 million. The arguments for and against Prop. 30 were litigated in saturation level television campaigns waged by both sides; total expenditures were nearly $70 million.

But while every election features a handful of state tax and bond proposals that get statewide attention, additional hundreds of local state and bond proposals fly under the radar. Fortunately, after each election cycle and once all the votes are certified – something that in California doesn’t occur until 30 days after election day – the California Taxpayers Association puts out a report that shows the outcome of every local tax and bond proposal.

The impact of these hundreds of bids to raise taxes and increase borrowing, as documented by CalTax, in sum can exceed the amounts of the statewide initiatives.

We saw this demonstrated yet again this past November, when 131 bond proposals were placed on local ballots up and down the state, along with 234 local tax proposals. Of the proposed local bonds, 86 percent of them were approved by voters, dumping another $23.2 billion in debt onto Californians. In terms of budget impact, based on a 5 percent interest rate and a 30 year term, this new borrowing is going to cost taxpayers another $1.5 billion per year in principal and interest payments.

The fate of local tax proposals tells a similar story. 65 percent of them were approved by voters, adding another $1.6 billion annual burden onto California’s taxpayers.

These local increases in taxes and borrowing, which are almost exclusively regressive and will cost taxpayers at least another $3.1 billion per year, are comparable to the impact of Prop. 30, had it passed. Prop. 30, which would have affected California’s already overtaxed wealthy households, was estimated to bring in between $3.0 and $5.0 billion per year.

It’s interesting to see the categories of new local taxes. Note the projected big earner categories: “Documentary Transfer Tax,” “Gross Receipts Tax,” and “Transactions and Use Tax” (sales tax). The first two of these three are relatively recent innovations in a system that for decades relied primarily on sales tax. Expect more innovative tax schemes, such as “Vacancy Tax,” presumably designed to discourage people from owning real estate unless they plan for it to be occupied.

The propensity for voters to approve local taxes is well documented, as the next chart proves. The only category that has not performed extraordinarily well over the past ten years are General Obligation Bonds, which, still while more likely than not to pass, rarely deliver supermajority rate of approval. This is because School Bonds only require a 55 percent majority in order to pass, whereas General Obligation Bonds require a two-thirds majority.

When proponents only have to get 55 percent of voters to approve a bond, it does pretty well. Measured by the amount of proposed borrowing, school bonds consistently log over 90 percent approval by California’s local voters. The payments to service these bonds typically appear on the property tax bills of homeowners, and the amounts are not trivial. Most Californians can expect to pay considerably more than the legislated maximum of 1 percent of their home’s value, mostly thanks to local school bonds that are exempt from these limits.

As for local taxes, 2022 was a below average year for proponents, passing “only” 65 percent of them by number, and 59 percent by amount. While highly favoring proponents, this rate of approval is considerably lower than in previous elections, and may indicate voter fatigue with new taxes.

Compared to other elections in the past decade, 2022 was not bad. While California taxpayers added over $3.0 billion to their annual tax burden, voters did not approve a single statewide tax or bond proposal.

It’s a little early to look ahead to 2024, but three initiatives have already qualified for the November 2024 ballot. One of them aims to “increase personal income taxes to fund pandemic detection and prevention.” Expect additional statewide proposals to increase taxes, since California’s much vaunted budget surplus has evaporated. Voters may also count on hundreds of local tax and bond proposals, and if history is any guide, shall approve the vast majority of them.

This article originally appeared in the California Globe.

ABOUT

Test Post with Comments

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam hendrerit ex ullamcorper facilisis hendrerit. Nulla vel mattis metus, ultrices faucibus leo. Sed mi felis, finibus a felis quis, maximus euismod purus. Vivamus in condimentum nunc. Maecenas euismod sem molestie pellentesque pulvinar. Maecenas molestie, velit id convallis pulvinar, enim leo dictum sapien, sed commodo magna enim id elit. Praesent imperdiet turpis sed ipsum ullamcorper accumsan.

Suspendisse potenti. Aliquam luctus interdum dui ac pharetra. Vestibulum sapien sem, pellentesque nec dictum at, hendrerit id sapien. Cras ut interdum dui. Aenean vulputate fringilla cursus. Donec elit ipsum, hendrerit nec ante quis, tristique vulputate nulla. Nam in volutpat dolor. Aenean vel mattis dolor.

Vivamus diam lectus, tincidunt in ex quis, consectetur ultricies est. Aenean eu lobortis nulla. Vestibulum ligula augue, lobortis sit amet mi sed, ullamcorper tristique neque. Vestibulum eget ligula tortor. Duis consequat hendrerit nulla. Sed et mi vitae tellus lacinia molestie rutrum a eros. Nulla facilisi. Praesent efficitur consequat dolor in posuere. Vestibulum quis volutpat ex, vitae tincidunt lectus. Duis rutrum purus eu urna vestibulum, nec ullamcorper neque pellentesque. Pellentesque tristique blandit sodales. Nunc nec sem egestas, vestibulum tellus id, euismod diam.

Cras a consectetur neque. Praesent et tortor rutrum, volutpat libero eu, dictum dui. Aliquam aliquet quis nulla in tincidunt. Nulla ut mollis mauris. In urna diam, fringilla ac porta non, blandit at dui. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Phasellus in nunc non augue viverra euismod eget at ligula. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Etiam quis nisl vel nunc dignissim lobortis. Phasellus vitae ante elit.