Tag Archive for: media bias

The American Media Has Betrayed America

There aren’t enough disparaging epithets in the English language to adequately describe “journalists” such as ABC Nightly News anchorman David Muir, the dashing forty-something actor who pretends to share important national news with America. Five days a week, Muir recites agenda driven propaganda as if it were truth, while his allies who run the social media monopolies throttle down, demonetize, shadowban, or flat out censor reports that conflict with his narrative.

One of Muir’s biggest crimes is his facade of objectivity. Unlike the hosts of the cable news networks, such as CNN’s rabid Don Lemon, or MSNBC’s smirking Rachel Maddow, Muir isn’t obvious. He spreads his phony lies and distortions with a straight face, never breaking character. If you aren’t exposed to the other side of his stories, it works.

It isn’t just David Muir, of course. Other pretenders include CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, who along with her reporters never saw a Spanish consonant that didn’t require a hard roll. NBC’s Lester Holt, who made it his business to debate candidate Trump in the 2016 presidential debates, instead of leaving that job to hapless Hillary. The diligent mediocrity who reports from the White House for NPR, who thinks everything has to do with race and gender, because flogging that obsession takes no work and reliably builds a career.

For over three years, and only with the occasional exception of Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, the entire American media establishment, online and offline, has been complicit in spreading lies; despicable, anti-American lies. They spread the Russian collusion hoax for nearly three years, shamelessly exaggerating every smug utterance from the loathsome Adam Schiff. Again and again, they predicted that this time, Trump’s presidency was done for, and when Trump was finally exonerated, they just moved on to the next hoax.

The catalog of malpractice committed by these malicious partisan hacks that call themselves journalists in America is too vast to summarize. The terrifying “white nationalists.” The baseless smears on Brett Kavanaugh. The Ukraine impeachment. The perennial “climate crisis,” which would always fill in whenever there wasn’t some more useful phony story to spread. And all of it, every single bit of it, was calculated to take down President Trump and stigmatize anyone and everyone who ever supported him or even just defended some of his actions.

The media’s capital crime, however, is their coverage of the Chinese Coronavirus pandemic. And if the national media establishment had not already repeatedly demonstrated that they are nothing more than a political action committee attached to the Democratic party, more people would be fooled. But as it is, the timing of this virus, the response to this virus, and the reporting on this virus; all of it is suspect. The repercussions of media malpractice is more deaths, destruction of the constitution, and quite likely an economic depression.

This is not overstating the case. Imagine if the media covered this crisis with honesty. Sure, in the early stages of this pandemic, nobody knew what to make of it. But why were the only voices accorded credibility by the media those who called for a lockdown? Why were virologists and epidemiologists ignored if they suggested that maybe we should quarantine the sick and the at-risk, and allow healthy Americans to acquire herd immunity? Look to Sweden’s experience. That approach is working there.

Worse, why has the media ignored every report or study or journal article or clinical abstract that finds treatment with hydroxychloroquine, zinc sulfate, and azithromycin to be effective? Why have they persistently spread the lie that a seven day course of hydroxychlorquinine is dangerous, when millions of people use it for years on end to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis? Why don’t we ever hear about doctors around the world that are successfully using this treatment to prevent COVID-19 in patients who have been exposed, and to cure it in patients who’ve tested positive? Why?

Who is pulling the strings of mainstream media in the United States? Why is it this media circus is focused on vaccines that may be available sometime next year, and will probably only be partially effective, without offering the slightest concern that vaccines are already over-prescribed? Everybody knows vaccines are an important tool to maintain public health, but why has the media painted the issue black and white? Maybe getting as many as 90 vaccines before the age of 18 is too many. Maybe vaccines should be used more judiciously. Maybe people don’t want to be forced into getting a vaccine in order to have an “immunity passport.”

The horrifying constitutional implications of where we’re headed as a nation during this dress rehearsal for martial law are not of interest to the media. Along with the nauseating, infantile feel-good-we’re-all-in-this-together corporate commercials that have rolled out in between the useless television newscasts, the only news coverage available paints people who object to the lockdown as, that’s right, Trump supporters. Or white nationalists. Or “conspiracy theorists.”

And why wouldn’t all of this be a conspiracy? Why wouldn’t a rational person at least consider that possibility, when this false, destructive news coverage is just the latest movement in a song they’ve been playing for years, where the repetitive theme is that conservatives are bad, nationalists are bad, patriots are bad, liberals are good, globalists are good, and the Trump “resistance” is noble? It’s far too coordinated, too well timed, too relentless, to not maybe be more than just the spontaneous product of independent deep thinkers like David Muir.

We are trained to think of a conspiracy as if it is inherently impossible, something that only a deranged individual would seriously consider as a possible explanation for events. That’s fine. Don’t call it a conspiracy. Call it a convergence of special interests that are smart enough to see where they want events to go, and therefore don’t require a score or a conductor. The instrumentalists who play in this elite orchestra are smart enough to know what they’ve done.

They didn’t choose the Swedish approach, and because they didn’t, every small business, every small landlord, every single propertied interest that lacks massive reserves of cash and capital, is now going to get gobbled up by multinationals. That’s a fact. And as millions wait in the unemployment lines – spaced six feet apart, wearing stupid masks of dubious value – they will depend on government to pay their bills, and they will not expect any Chinese coronovirus cure for which big pharma does not approve.

The media has always been powerful. With the advent of social media, today they are more powerful than ever. And they don’t care about Americans. They don’t care about America. They do the bidding of a global elite that wants to stamp out populist dissent around the world. It wants to consolidate economic power in the hands of billionaires and corporations. It wants to erase borders and nationalities. It wants to drive billions of people out of rural areas and into megacities. For these elites, the Chinese coronovirus pandemic is a golden opportunity.

It’s not a conspiracy, though. It’s just the conventional wisdom of the super rich. The media, if they cared, now more than ever would do their historic job, questioning this conventional wisdom. Instead they are tools. It is unforgivable.

This article originally appeared on the website American Greatness.

 *   *   *

A Week in the Life of ABC Nightly “News”

ABC Nightly News, televised daily across the nation at 5:30 p.m., offers what is perhaps the lowest common denominator of the mainstream media’s liberal, anti-Trump bias. But if you compare what ABC has to say to what actually constitutes balanced reporting, as well as to what actually qualifies as newsworthy reporting, ABC falls short. By these standards, i.e., by what used to be the basic editorial criteria for good journalism, ABC Nightly “News” is a dangerous fraud. They spew propaganda, calibrated at an almost infantile level, calculated to reinforce carefully nurtured biases within their television audience.

ABC news is anchored by the dashing metrosexual, David Muir, an actor of extraordinary skill. Muir, along with a laudably diverse collection of equally telegenic thespians masquerading as “journalists,” manages to exude convincing gravitas despite delivering, night after night, an embarrassing 30 minute infotainment sham, mixing in equal parts pablum and agenda-driven propaganda. Forget about the Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Television Political Journalism, or the Edward R. Murrow Award. Give David Muir an Oscar.

ABC Nightly “News” is easily dissected. Their 30 minute formula, which all three legacy networks follow, consists of a prolonged opening segment, about 15 minutes in length, in which the supposedly top national and international stories are presented. An examination of what they reported on last week, during the five days from August 5th through August 9th, provides ample evidence of just how far removed they are from genuine journalism.

Monday August 5th

Top story: the tragic shootings in Dayton and El Paso. Almost immediately Muir had to connect the shootings to “growing scrutiny on the president.” Video clips were shown of Trump responding to someone who shouted “shoot them” at one of Trump’s rallies, followed by commentary stressing how “Trump has downplayed the threat of white supremacists.” With respect to the two shooters, the focus was on evidence of the El Paso shooter’s racism, with the left wing lunacy of the Dayton shooter barely mentioned.

The rest of the top stories for ABC on 8/05 were on the following topics: “94 percent of Americans support background checks” (let’s see that survey question), the Dow Jones Index was down 767 points (with blame placed on Trump’s “trade war” with China with the implicit assumption being we should not be in a trade war with China), and North Korea fired some short range missiles (with no acknowledgement that they are refraining from firing long-range missiles thanks to Trump’s diplomacy).

Tuesday August 6th

Muir leads off by claiming the Dayton shooter was “motivated by violent ideology.” In a prolonged exploration of the “red flags” exhibited by the shooter over several years, it was only mentioned as a very brief aside that his chosen ideologies were leftist. Follow up reporting on the mass shootings continued with a report on the El Paso shooter, where his right-wing ideology was on full narrative display along with a report that he had “no remorse,” and that he went on his rampage specifically to “find Mexicans.”

Tuesday’s mass shooting coverage continued with an attack on Trump’s visit to El Paso, with Muir’s monologue buttressed by words on the television screen saying “words of comfort fight words that came before.” This is an ongoing tactic used by ABC “news” in their war on Trump – they will selectively grab out of context remarks made by Trump in the past that they claim contradict something he said more recently. In this case, for example, they reprised Trump’s description of the out-of-control flood of immigrants across America’s southern border as an “invasion.” This extended segment then dove into selective interviews with Trump haters attending Democratic presidential candidate rallies, followed by carefully curated anti-Trump soundbites from the mayors of Dayton and El Paso, along with “Beto” O’Rourke.

The top stories kept coming on Tuesday; including a familiar new theme in the mainstream national “news,” a weather report. “Severe storms across the mid-west” with “climate change” as the frightening subtext. Then a report on house fires caused by natural gas leaks in Detroit, Kentucky, and North Carolina, with the subtext being “fossil fuel is dangerous.” Then the obligatory revelation of yet another example of police racism, this time the clickworthy video of two cops on horseback arresting a mentally ill African American (subtext: America is saturated in white racism).

Wednesday August 7th

Apparently there was not much real news on 8/07, so the top story was a weather report on “severe storms, tornadoes, heavy rain and floods.” Then, after this mandatory reminder of terrifying climate change, the focus shifted to messaging designed to create the impression the nation is gripped by gun rights induced chaos and terror. The onscreen text read “Nation on Edge,” as Muir’s substitute anchor for the rest of the week, Tom Llamas, launched into a sober recitation of just how bad things have gotten. His rather underwhelming examples were a false alarm concerning a gunman at USA Today’s offices, a motorcycle’s backfire scaring tourists in New York’s Times Square, and a “loud noise in Utah” that frightened people. “So many Americans on edge,” he concluded.

What next on Wednesday? Of course, Trump bashing. The onscreen text? “Trump’s Polarizing Trip,” where the president’s visits to Dayton and El Paso are disparaged as ill advised forays at the same time as supposedly “the White House is keeping him [Trump] out of view” (subtext: because he’s so toxic). Then the video cuts to Joe Biden, claiming that Trump “in clear language and in code, is fanning the flames of racism.” This is followed by further out-of-context comments by Trump, along with other top stories including a “Home Blast Hate Crime” involving “racial slurs and a swatsika,” a “Deadly Police Shooting” in Colorado Springs where a black man was shot when he allegedly reached for a gun, and “ICE Raids.”

Thursday August 8th

The top stories, in order: “Deadly Stabbing Spree” with “dangerous incidents across the country,” followed by two examples, Orange County, where a gang member went berserk (but no mention of how California’s “early release” law put him back on the street), along cursory coverage of a stabbing in Pittsburgh. Then, “Dangerous Escapee Manhunt” in Tennessee (subtext: you’re not safe), followed by “Sweeping Immigration Raids” where a crying six year old is filmed saying “my dad didn’t do nothing, he’s not a criminal.” But Thursday’s propaganda rich broadcast was just getting warmed up.

Also offered up in the string of top stories reported on Thursday 8/08 were “Mother’s Warning,” a story explaining that the El Paso shooter’s mother had contacted police to see if there was any way to regulate her son’s purchase of a firearm and was told there was not (subtext: we need more gun control). This story was closely paired with a report that in El Paso “none of the victims were willing or able to meet with the president (subtext: who would want to meet with that racist), then campaign reportage “Taking on Trump” with several candidates – Biden, O’Rourke, Warren – asked “is the president a white supremacist?” Talk about a softball question.

Thursday’s top stories wrapped up with two climate change reports. The first, “Severe Storm Damage,” described tornadoes and flooding in the eastern U.S., then the more consequential second one, with “Dire Climate Warning” emblazoned on the television screen as Llamas described a “new study” that reports “soil being lost 100 times faster than it is being formed,” with absolutely zero explanation of what that was supposed to mean, much less what assumptions were made or who came up with this study. The concluding words to this segment? “There’s hope if we act fast.”

Friday August 9th

End of the work week, and more of the same from ABC. “New Walmart Panic” was the top story, covering the odd fact of a young man walking into a Walmart store in Missouri armed with a rifle and wearing body armor. Nothing bad happened, fortunately, but this was the top story.

Then, to reinforce ABC’s “America is a terrifying place to live” theme, the second top story on ABC on 8/09 was a road rage incident in Houston where an alleged gang member armed with an assault rifle killed another alleged gang member. The #3 story was “Bombshell Documents Unsealed” with respect to the Epstein case. This could be a big story exposing a lot of powerful Democrats, unless something happens to Epstein before he can testify…

Friday’s top stories concluded predictably. The titles written onscreen are self-explanatory: “Meaningful Background Checks,” “Dangerous Storms,” “Dangerous Escapee Manhunt,” and “El Paso Suspect Confessed” (to committing a hate crime).

What is the agenda of ABC Nightly “News”?

ABC’s choice of news stories, and how they present these stories, reveal a clear agenda. Trump is a racist, America is a racist nation, it is dangerous to walk the streets anywhere in America anymore, and a devastating climate apocalypse is already upon us (for which Trump is to blame).

Missing from these stories is any semblance of balance. What is the statistical context for mass shootings, crime rates, racially motivated murders and hate crimes, police misconduct, or extreme weather? Would the facts – that none of these phenomena are remarkably elevated today vs in the past, or numerically significant according to any reasonable standard – defeat the agenda?

Also missing from these stories is a sense of proportion. Obviously a mass shooting deserves national news coverage, but does every storm belong among the top stories? A road rage incident? A follow up story making misleading claims about who the president visited in El Paso? An escaped prisoner? A natural gas fire? An allegedly controversial yet routine arrest?

The disturbing reality is you can’t criticize these story choices anymore without being considered insensitive, or worse. Incidents involving human suffering, much less murders, are horrific. To dismiss them as not newsworthy invites accusations of indifference that are not entirely unfounded. But what else happened in the world last week? What did ABC Nightly “News” ignore?

Here are just a few items that might have deserved a minute or two on ABC Nightly “News” last week:

India has just abolished Kashmir’s autonomy after nearly 70 years, an action that will provoke mass unrest and could even push India into another war with Pakistan. Anti-government protests, involving millions of people, are escalating in Hong Kong. The U.S. Navy just sent the super carrier Ronald Reagan through the South China Sea. America and the U.K. are creating a maritime coalition to protect Persian Gulf shipping from Iran, and Germany is refusing to participate. Google is possibly collaborating with Huawei. This just scratches the surface.

Why doesn’t ABC report this news? Could it be that informing the American public as to what’s actually going on in the world is not their primary concern?

 *   *   *