Tag Archive for: Jerry Brown

No Profits, No Pensions

/by

California Gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown knows he’s in a fight. His presumptive Republican opponent, Meg Whitman, not only is doing a good job presenting herself as a socially moderate, fiscally conservative candidate, but she has abundant personal wealth she can tap in order to finance her campaign. So Jerry Brown has to turn to the only reliable source of campaign cash out there, the public employee unions.

In Joel Fox’s report of March 22nd entitled “Brown Embraces the Public Unions,” Fox quotes Brown as saying “California’s fiscal problems are not the unions’ fault but that of Wall Street and corporations.” Get ready for a campaign season filled with more bashing of corporations. And here are some reasons why this rhetoric is absurd, nihilistic, corrosive, deceptive, utterly bankrupt, and at least to-date, tragically effective:

Public sector unions are by far the most powerful source of campaign cash in California. They can pretty much spend as much as they want to make sure their candidates get elected, and their opponents are defeated. Without these unions, Jerry Brown wouldn’t have a chance against Meg Whitman. But is Brown only singing the union song in order to get their financial support? After all, in late February 2010, in a closed meeting with a group of California business leaders, Brown admitted the single greatest mistake he made as Governor back in the 1970’s was his decision to sign legislation allowing public sector workers to unionize.

Public sector unions have successfully convinced Californians that Wall Street and corporations are basically to blame for all the problems in our society – from deficits to poverty, from bad public policies to social injustice. But public sector unions are in bed with Wall Street. In the United States, there is no source of new investment capital bigger than public employee pension funds – most of it flowing through Wall Street brokerages. The public sector unions, through their pension funds and through the state and municipal governments – which they control – worked with Wall Street and enabled Wall Street. It was Wall Street who packaged the investments that public pension funds purchased – and it was Wall Street and the public sector unions who, more than anyone, wanted to believe they could earn 8.0% annual returns forever.

That’s not all. In 2006, California’s legislature, controlled by public employees, enacted AB32, California’s “Global Warming Act.” Already, agencies and utilities throughout California are tacking “global warming mitigation” fees into their billings. And in less than two years, when AB32 takes full effect and California starts auctioning tradeable CO2 emission allowances, it is Wall Street firms who will broker these CO2 allowances, and it is Wall Street who will package all the CO2 “offset” prospectuses. Read the “scoping plan” from CARB, which lays out how AB32 will be implemented. You will learn how CO2 “offset projects” – which will receive the proceeds of the CO2 emission allowance auctions – will earn reimbursements by how much they reduce CO2 emissions. For example, by mandating even more draconian high-density than we already endure here in California, municipalities will be able to calculate the emissions they have saved relative to “sprawl,” and collect annual reimbursements. Pet projects that create jobs at taxpayers expense for union workers, such as light rail, will go in regardless of practicality, and also receive carbon offset funds calculated on the basis of their potential to reduce CO2 emissions. California’s global warming act, which will do nothing to address alleged global warming, is a scheme, hatched by public sector bureaucrats to transfer more money from taxpayers into the government. And Wall Street will stage-manage the entire process – making billions in fees.

When Jerry Brown, on behalf of public sector unions, demonizes Wall Street, he’s being a blatant hypocrite, but at least he has a point. In the case of industrial corporations who want to employ people and build actual products, however, Brown and the public sector unions have no point. According to Brown and the unions, if only corporations would behave themselves and pay their “fair share,” all of our problems would disappear. Where is the logical end-point of this nonsense? The last politician to tell the truth about taxes and corporations probably was Ronald Reagan, who correctly pointed out “corporations don’t pay taxes, because they pass the taxes through to the consumer as a cost – ultimately it is individuals who pay taxes.” The public sector union’s answer to this truth, observed by Reagan and confirmed by history, is for government to simply reduce corporate “profits.” If the corporations were forced to make less in profit, supposedly they could afford to pay higher taxes AND charge a fair price to consumers for their products. But profits are the life-blood of economic growth and wealth creation. Without profits, there is no reinvestment in equipment and upgrades, no research and new product development, no new job creation, no dividends to shareholders, and no stock appreciation which provides the return to public employee pension funds. No profits, no pensions. And in any event, corporations in California are beat down, intimidated by public sector unions and environmentalist attorneys, reeling from the effects of recession and the impact of excessive, punitive regulations. California’s business community has been practicing appeasement with the public sector unions and environmentalist attorneys for years – they cower like Théoden, King of Rohan, wasting away, corrupted by fear, waiting for Gandalf and Aragorn to awaken him before all is lost. But we live in California, not Middle Earth.

What public sector unions ought to know, and cannot admit, is that tax revenues they collect and allocate, especially through public pension fund investments, are the engine that fuels Wall Street, and they are as responsible as anyone else in this economy for the excesses and abuse of the financial sector in America. What they also should know, as they watch their pension funds crumble, is the fiscal policies they have forced onto compliant politicians are unsustainable and are cannibalizing the wealth of the country. To distract voters from this financial fact: that California’s public sector bureaucrats, on average, now make 50% more in base pay, 100% more in current benefits, and 200% more in retirement security – compared to the taxpayers who now serve them and pay for this hideous inequity – public sector unions and the candidates they control must preach the politics of resentment and envy, hatred of wealth and environmental panic, corporate demonizing and phony Wall Street bashing. They must brainwash our children in their union-dominated public schools, and bamboozle our electorate through their massive campaign advertising, so they can continue to feed for a few more years on the ailing carcass of what was once the greatest free-market economy in the history of the world.

For more on public sector unions and government solvency in California, read:

The Razor’s Edge – Inflation vs. Deflation, March 15th , 2010

Pension Rhetoric vs. Pension Reality, February 24th, 2010

California’s Union Ballot Initiatives, February 18th, 2010

Sustainable Pension Fund Returns, February 2nd, 2010

California’s Personnel Costs, January 24th, 2010

Maintaining Pensions Solvency, January 9th, 2010

Real Rates of Return, June 26th, 2009

The Once & Future Governor Jerry Brown

/by

Yesterday the 71 year old Jerry Brown made his formal entry into the California Governor’s race. In a three minute announcement posted on www.jerrybrown.org, he highlighted his experience as well as took some indirect shots at his opponents. What kind of a Governor Jerry Brown was, and what kind of a Governor he would make, are an interesting topic for discussion.

Jerry Brown first served as Governor of California in the years 1975 to 1983. Elected when he was only 36 years old, Brown inherited a State that was experiencing one of the best economies in its history. The first efflorescence of the high-tech boom happened during Brown’s years as Governor, it was also the heyday of the west-coast aerospace boom. Other sectors of the State’s economy, from housing to agriculture, and everything in between, had not yet fallen prey to the plague of over-regulation and environmentalist gridlock that has since diminished opportunities in the Golden State. Brown presided over some very good years for California.

Brown is still criticized by mainstream journalists for being Governor when Proposition 13 was passed. This is guilt by association at most, he campaigned hard against the initiative. But when Prop. 13 passed, something happened that is instructive about Jerry Brown – he implemented it with a vengeance. He respected the will of the voters. Something the critics ignore, however, is that Prop. 13 didn’t hinder California’s ability to balance its budget, it was something else Jerry Brown did that caused our current fiscal crisis – his decision in 1977 to sign legislation allowing public sector employees to unionize.

The consequences of Prop. 13, which dramatically lowered property tax rates, have not led to insufficient tax revenue to California’s state and local governments. The culprit is public sector unionization, which has created an over-sized public sector workforce where, on average, workers cost about twice what people doing similar work requiring similar skills might cost employers in the private sector (when normalizing for current benefits and the funding requirements for future health and pension benefits). While this point is open to debate, it is relevant to note that Jerry Brown himself, in a very recent private appearance before a group of California business leaders, admitted the single greatest mistake he made as Governor back in the 1970’s was his decision to sign legislation allowing public sector workers to unionize. This fact – that Jerry Brown understands how the government bureaucrats, through their unions, have themselves taken over California’s the government, buying our elections, controlling legislation, determining their own compensation – is perhaps the most encouraging thing about Jerry Brown. At age 71, Brown isn’t thinking about his next career move. He may decide to take these guys on, and fix what he helped break so many years ago – our democracy.

Brown is rightly praised for having been a tight-fisted Governor, reining in spending even before Prop. 13 was enacted. He is also proven to be tough on crime, not only as Governor but also as Mayor of Oakland. These are formidable credentials for any Democrat running for office against moderate Republicans. But it should be noted that one of the reasons Governor Jerry Brown was able to rein in spending was because he canceled many infrastructure projects that California now desperately needs. California has a system of freeways, dams, aqueducts and power plants that is designed for a state with 20 million people, as the population edges towards twice that. If you are wondering why you are stuck in traffic, enjoying gridlock five days a week, Jerry Brown is part of the reason why.

This brings us to the biggest potential problem with Jerry Brown. Like his contemporary in high California office these days, Governor Schwarzenegger, Brown has bought the entire package of environmentalist extremism. In the name of fighting global warming, along with all the assorted environmentalist imperatives, Jerry Brown is one of the architects of artificial scarcity. This, too, is an assertion that invites in-depth debate, but Jerry Brown has aggressively and consistently supported environmentalist legislation. Here’s the problem with environmentalism when it gets out of balance and goes too far, as it has: It should be the goal of regulated public utilities, and public policy in general, to make resources cheaper, not more expensive. Contrived scarcity is an invention of misguided environmentalists, and it is championed by the rest of the Democratic machine because the funds that are gathered through taxation for “mitigation,” and additionally saved through deferred investment (since every infrastructure improvement is a crime against the planet), flow instead into the pockets of overpaid unionized public sector and public utility employees, who control our government. This connectivity eludes Jerry Brown, at least for now, and for this reason, he is potentially a very dangerous man.

What makes Jerry Brown intriguing is he is a wild card. He is independent-minded, he is intelligent, he is flexible, he is courageous, and he knows the system backwards and forwards. Journalists used to make fun of Jerry Brown for once recommending California start up its own space program. What is so bad about that? It would be a spectacularly better use of funds than overpaying public sector bureaucrats, or continuing self-perpetuating, corrosive entitlement programs. And it would yield spectacular technological spin-offs. Jerry Brown’s willingness to go out on a limb like this makes him a quintessential Californian, and the kind of visionary who could bring California back from the brink.

If Jerry Brown is elected Governor, the real question is not can he do the job, but who will show up? Will Jerry Brown accede to the reality of public sector union power and quasi-fascist environmentalist extremism – the power centers who currently are breaking California to their will, bankrupting us to line their pockets and salve their ideologies, and turning us, basically, into an occupied State? Or will Jerry Brown empathize with the seismic wave of populist sentiment that knows something is wrong, but can’t find coherent expression or clear solutions? Will Jerry Brown provide these answers – by reforming public sector unions, and developing infrastructure designed to reduce the price of resources instead of raising them? Jerry Brown has the capacity to make either of these scenarios our future. How he campaigns may provide clues to how he may govern, or not.