China’s Economic Challenges

Previous posts this year, “The China Bubble,” and “National Debt and Rates of Return,” have already emphasized that China’s real estate market is grossly overvalued. Today on the respected economics blog GlobalEconomicAnalysis.com, Mike Shedlock has offered new insights on the coming correction in China which he, too, has seen coming for a long time. In his post “China Hikes Rates, Ponders Capital Controls to Halt Currency Inflows,” Shedlock lists eight reasons China faces a hard landing:

  • Hot money inflows
  • Huge property bubble
  • Massive increases in money supply, much of it property speculation and building of unneeded capacity
  • Currency manipulation charges from the US and potential trade wars
  • Unsterilized trade imbalances fuel inflation
  • Slowing Europe
  • Dearth of Jobs for new graduates
  • Potential social unrest

Shedlock also provides a link to a story posted December 18th, 2010 on the U.K. Daily Mail’s website entitled “The ghost towns of China” that shows amazing satellite images of deserted cities that are meant to be home to millions. And today in the Wall Street Journal, a column by Hugo Restall entitled “China’s Real-Estate Frenzy” has this to say about a property bubble in China, “Housing prices in the U.S. peaked at 6.4 times average annual earnings this decade. In Beijing, the figure is 22 times.”

You don’t have to be an economist to understand that the combination of millions of empty, excess housing and commercial units, combined with prices for these units that have appreciated at a rate 22 times earnings growth in a single decade is a problem. Combined with the other reasons Shedlock so aptly summarizes, including surplus labor and a slowing market for exports, one may reasonably conclude China’s economy is in serious trouble.

There is an interesting story from Reason Magazine, written over a year ago by Anthony Randazzo, Michael Flynn and Adam Summers entitled “Turning Japanese,” that offers one of the best summaries of how the debt bubble caused economic stagnation in Japan and now threatens the United States. As they put it, “A long real estate bubble that had expanded extra rapidly for the previous five years suddenly burst, and asset prices came crashing back down to earth. Banks and financial institutions were left holding piles of worthless paper, and the economy soon headed south.” This article is perhaps even more applicable to China, where the banking system is so opaque it is hard to assess how much they depend on margin lending.

Shedlock makes a very good point in his recent post on China when he states “It is not ‘consumer price inflation’ that is the big problem. Asset inflation, especially property speculation is rampant.” This underscores a serious problem with conventional economic indicators which do not adequately emphasize both aggregate debt in a nation as well as asset inflation.

The United States, which confronts a total debt (all debt, commercial, consumer and government) to GDP ratio of 3.7 to 1.0, is none-the-less in a stronger position than China or the Eurozone. For one thing, we actually know what the debt to GDP ratio is in the U.S. In China the actual numbers are virtually impossible to determine, and in the sixteen nations comprising the Eurozone the numbers, while somewhat more transparent than China’s, are fragmented and also nearly impossible to compile. But these balance sheet considerations – the total debt, total assets, and the volatility of asset values, define a nation’s economic vitality at least as much as the leading indicators so favored by conventional economists. And by those balance sheet measures, China is headed for a day of reckoning.

Equally important in the relative assessment of the U.S., the Eurozone, and China’s economic prospects are factors where the U.S. is clearly advantaged: the U.S. has a diverse economy that is three times larger than China’s, technological and scientific leadership, military supremacy, a robust and reasonably transparent democracy, relative civil calm, and the youngest demographic age distribution of any developed nation. Because of these advantages, the United States, despite alarming levels of debt, may still manage to avoid a deflationary collapse. China has none of these factors working in her favor and is challenged accordingly.

5 comments to China’s Economic Challenges

  • Charles

    Question (for me) of the day:

    What exactly does CIV FI mean?

    It looks like 104 Fidelis to me. As in semper fi?

    Thanks.

  • Editor

    CIV FI stands for civic finance. It also stands for civitas fidelis, which is latin for faith in civilization.

  • Charles

    Dear Mr. Ring

    I have noticed your candor and I appreciate it. Even slowly typing behind a keyboard a person can lose temper.

    Although this occurs it should not.

    Therefore, this being the start of a New Year, I apologize to Tough Love and Rex and anyone else I probably make the mistake of jumping instead of reasoning with.

    Thank You and to all the \"Usual Suspects\" may you and yours enjoy a prosperous New Year.

  • Charles

    This is a comment from another source. You might want to say something about it. It has to do with logic and reasoning.

    Seven plus One Common Propaganda Devices:

    1.Name Calling. Here the propagandist appeals to our hate and fear by giving “bad names” to those individuals, groups, nations, races, policies, practices, beliefs, and ideals that he would have us condemn and reject without substantive evidence. Example: “Obstinate Public Sector Unions”, “Political Clout”

    2.Glittering Generalities. The use of “virtue” words used to appeal to our emotions, e.g., good versus bad. By comparing his chosen group with shining ideals, he seeks to win us to his cause, and accept and approve it at face value. “The signs of this new awakening are gathering!” Which just said absolutely nothing.

    3.Transfer. The device used to sanction some supposed authority or expert of prestige of something OR someone we respect. For example, FDR, PBS, Associated General Contractors of America, Building Construction Trades Council of New York, International Association of Ironworkers, Manhattan Institute, Governor Christie, Governor Cuomo, etc.

    4.The “Testimonial” (given out in the Land of Oz) usually employed only in social, economic, and political issues. Quote from a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, “Not only that, they are beginning to understand the dysfunctional relationship between collective bargaining for government employees and their own job prospects.” (Huh?)

    A Statement of supposed fact. With nothing to back it.

    5.Plain Folks. A device used to appear to be people like ourselves to win our confidence. Examples: “New appreciation of the private sector”, “Some of these folks are beginning to notice” “In this they have something fundamental in common even with the fat cats on Wall St. who already stole the private sector pensions.”

    6.Card Stacking. Here, Mr. “I want your attention” is providing smoke screen by raising a new issue when he wants embarrassing matters forgotten (foreclosures, bank bailouts and Wall Street Market declines). The use of this phrase: “the disconnect between Main Street and Wall Street” generally refers to Corporate Welfare getting more financial incentives than small businesses, which is…um,..hypocritical and makes this article preposterous on its face.”
    Huh times two? As in BS)

    7.Bandwagon….device to make us follow the crowd…to make us accept the propagandist’s program en masse. “All the states are doing it” (Well maybe all the States are wrong.)

    8. We should also like to add “Divide and Conquer” or gate-keeping by pitting two individuals or groups against each other in order to preserve the status quo. “Wall Street paid more into campaigns than any other industry sector!” {OMG!)
    So? What are you really trying to prove? As in were they right or wrong doing it?

  • Burton Haynes

    I went to University to study economics for 2 years, and I swear I learned more from 1 week of reading your blog then I did the whole time there.